You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just to add some more relevant problems/questions:
Queue names: Users probably want to name their queues if they have multiple. So we also need to synchronize those queue names (and allow renaming).
Episodes in multiple queues: Another question is whether users want to put the same episode into multiple queues or if it is enough to allow an episode only once in all queues and it gets removed from a queue if added to another.
It could lead to problems if clients would behave differently, so this definitely needs to be addressed.
Multiple vs single queues: A way to deal with clients who don't have multiple queues could be to designate a default queue. The clients who don't support multiple queues would then only sync this queue.
Another solution could be that the queues are concatenated (put in a row) if a client accesses the single queue endpoint. But then we would need to define a queue order and it could be difficult to merge changes if a client who supports only one queue moves episodes around. So a default queue may be a bit better (if users would understand it).
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
From meeting notes:
All reactions