Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi, I would not use the new QSpaceHessian for now; we found a severe bug in the implementation that prevents it from getting the correct result. We are preparing a new release with a fixed version, which we hope to release in 1 month (or at least merge into the master branch).

Version 1.7 should fix it definitively and make it the default mode when calling the standard get_free_energy_hessian; however, as it stands now, if q != -q + G points are present in the mesh, the calculation is unreliable (unfortunately, this means that it passes tests on small supercells like 2x2x2, giving the false impression of reproducing the correct results).

We have a working branch that we will hopefully mer…

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by mesonepigreco
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants