-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
add tmp file write/read step #358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+42
−12
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
23cd3fe
add tmp file write/read step
j-atkins f60d769
small refactor: consolidate spacetime_buffer_size and limit_spec dict…
j-atkins e0187b1
to FetchSpec dataclass
j-atkins bbb24de
add tmp file write/read step
j-atkins 98c3023
remove depth axis reversal now using depth='elevation' in copernicusm…
j-atkins c7f2c10
tidy up todo
j-atkins 1ff483a
Merge branch 'v4-tmp-files' of github.com:OceanParcels/virtualship in…
j-atkins aa2339e
Merge branch 'migrate-v4' into v4-tmp-files
j-atkins e1c5122
small update: fetch spec to match changes implemented in #359
j-atkins 710acab
add test for _via_tmp_ds
j-atkins 528e7c9
add to_windowed_arrays() back in
j-atkins File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it worth checking/making sure what the backend is, here? Either Dask or NumPy? See also the (draft) performance guide at https://parcels--2705.org.readthedocs.build/en/2705/user_guide/examples/explanation_performance.html.
If it turns out to use Dask under the hood, then make sure to also do a
to_windowed_arrayscall; otherwise performance could still be poorThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fieldsets are consistently NumPy backed across different instruments and checked against large/long expeditions. As discussed though, I have added
to_windowed_arraysas a safe option, just in case there are rare scenarios where Dask is used.