Skip to content

[docs-agent] Fix stale future enhancements, document --no-wait flag, fix build path - #110

Open
redhat-chai-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift-online:mainfrom
redhat-chai-bot:docs/update-cli-docs-2026-07-31
Open

[docs-agent] Fix stale future enhancements, document --no-wait flag, fix build path#110
redhat-chai-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift-online:mainfrom
redhat-chai-bot:docs/update-cli-docs-2026-07-31

Conversation

@redhat-chai-bot

@redhat-chai-bot redhat-chai-bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated Documentation Update

Changes Made

Three documentation fixes across the CLI repository covering stale content, missing flag documentation, and an incorrect path.

Triggered By

Recent PRs (last 7 days):

Overall Validation:

  • docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md: Removed 3 items from "Future Enhancements" that are already implemented: dry-run mode (--dry-run), stack outputs export (--output-file), and verbose logging (-v/--verbose). Keeping them listed as future work could lead to duplicate implementation attempts.
  • README.md: Added --no-wait flag to 4 command flag tables (cluster-vpc create/delete, cluster-iam create/delete, cluster-oidc create/delete, bootstrap create). Default is false.
  • docs/guides/DEVELOPMENT.md: Fixed binary output path from ./rosactl to ./bin/rosactl (matching the Makefile's BUILD_DIR=./bin).

Undocumented areas noted (for human review):

  • docs/guides/DEVELOPMENT.md project structure tree is missing several directories (nodepool/, clusteroidc/, ec2/, elb/, route53/, session.go). A comprehensive tree update would require listing 40+ files and is better done by a human familiar with the intended level of detail.

Generated by Chai Bot documentation update task (weekly validation).


Automated by scheduled task rosa_hyperfleet_docs_update (instructions: ship_help_bot/shared/instructions/scheduled/rosa_hyperfleet_docs_update.md, run: b1479773, commit: b4cb94ed-dirty)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Reformatted command-option tables for improved readability.
    • Documented the --no-wait option for VPC, IAM, OIDC, and bootstrap commands.
    • Updated the development guide with the correct build output path.
    • Revised the architecture roadmap to include dry-run mode, stack output export, and verbose logging.

…fix build path

- ARCHITECTURE.md: Remove 3 items from Future Enhancements that are
  already implemented (--dry-run, --output-file, --verbose)
- README.md: Document --no-wait flag on all CloudFormation command
  flag tables (cluster-vpc, cluster-iam, cluster-oidc, bootstrap)
- DEVELOPMENT.md: Fix build output path from ./rosactl to ./bin/rosactl
- Ran prettier on all modified markdown files

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

Documentation updates reformat README option tables, document --no-wait for four commands, revise architecture roadmap items, and correct the development binary path to ./bin/rosactl.

Changes

Documentation updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
README command options
README.md
README option tables were reformatted. The --no-wait option was added for VPC, IAM, OIDC, and bootstrap commands.
Architecture roadmap
docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md
The Future Enhancements list now includes dry-run mode, stack output export, and verbose logging. Remaining items were renumbered.
Development binary path
docs/guides/DEVELOPMENT.md
Setup instructions now reference ./bin/rosactl.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Suggested labels: lgtm, approved

Suggested reviewers: cdoan1, gdbranco

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 10 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Ai-Attribution ⚠️ Warning AI use is stated in the PR and tip commit, but the commit has Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 and no Assisted-by or Generated-by trailer. Replace the AI Co-Authored-By trailer with the required Red Hat attribution trailer, such as Generated-by or Assisted-by, in the PR commit history.
✅ Passed checks (10 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the documentation updates, including the future enhancements list, --no-wait flag, and build path correction.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR changes only Markdown. Added lines contain no weak-crypto algorithms or secret comparisons; existing SHA-1 thumbprint code predates this PR and is unchanged.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed The PR changes only three Markdown files. No privilege-related manifest lines were added; existing docker-compose privileged: true is unchanged from the parent commit.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed Only Markdown files changed; added lines contain no logging, credentials, tokens, PII, or hostnames. Existing HTTP-body logging guidance was not changed.
No-Hardcoded-Secrets ✅ Passed The PR adds only documentation formatting and flag/path text. Added-line scans found no hardcoded secrets, credential-bearing URLs, private keys, or high-entropy/base64 secret strings.
No-Injection-Vectors ✅ Passed The PR changes only three Markdown files; the diff contains documentation text, and searches found no SQL concatenation, shell=True, eval/exec, pickle.loads, unsafe yaml.load, os.system, or dangero...
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: redhat-chai-bot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ravitri for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/guides/DEVELOPMENT.md`:
- Line 42: Update the remaining development workflow command near the documented
./bin/rosactl path to invoke the binary from ./bin instead of the repository
root, keeping the command consistent with the Makefile output location and the
existing documentation.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift-online/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 5649ec4e-b103-477b-af30-d420c55b8081

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b9fe59 and fea57e0.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md
  • docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md
  • docs/guides/DEVELOPMENT.md

```

The binary will be available at `./rosactl`.
The binary will be available at `./bin/rosactl`.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Update the remaining binary path in the development workflow.

Line 42 correctly documents ./bin/rosactl, but line 81 still runs ./rosactl. After make build, that command fails because the Makefile writes the binary to ./bin.

Proposed fix
-./rosactl cluster-vpc create test --region us-east-1 --help
+./bin/rosactl cluster-vpc create test --region us-east-1 --help
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@docs/guides/DEVELOPMENT.md` at line 42, Update the remaining development
workflow command near the documented ./bin/rosactl path to invoke the binary
from ./bin instead of the repository root, keeping the command consistent with
the Makefile output location and the existing documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant